DIVB vs. BKIE
DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while BKIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVB returned 12.76%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for BKIE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
DIVB vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.78% return.
DIVB
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- 28.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.10%
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.64%
DIVB vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 21.10% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 37.10% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.78% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVB and BKIE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DIVB and BKIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVB vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
DIVB
BKIE
DIVB vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVB | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 1.89 | +2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.18 | 7.24 | +6.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVB vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVB | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -28.19% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.82% | -11.41% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -13.19% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -28.19% | +7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -2.34% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.90% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 2.97% | -0.94% |
Volatility
DIVB vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 3.70%. This indicates that DIVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVB | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 3.70% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 13.03% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 15.22% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 16.18% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 16.32% | +2.03% |
DIVB vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIVB vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BKIE's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.23% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.19% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVB and BKIE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to BKIE (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVB dropped -36.93% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.76% vs 9.60% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for DIVB.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.19% for DIVB.
DIVB is categorized as Dividend, while BKIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for DIVB and 0.04% for BKIE.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVB and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer