DIV vs. FVD
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - DIV tracks the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index while FVD tracks the Value Line Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.14%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for FVD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FVD.
Performance
DIV vs. FVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed FVD with an annualized return of 4.14%, while FVD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.66% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
FVD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
DIV vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 4.43% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -3.49% | 12.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and FVD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DIV and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIV vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
FVD
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
FVD
Real Estate
DIV
FVD
Industrials
DIV
FVD
Utilities
DIV
FVD
Consumer Defensive
DIV
FVD
Communication Services
DIV
FVD
Basic Materials
DIV
FVD
Financial Services
DIV
FVD
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
FVD
Healthcare
DIV
FVD
Technology
DIV
-
FVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
FVD
DIV vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 1.36 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 3.48 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and FVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -51.00% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -7.23% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -11.97% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -16.41% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -35.25% | -17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -3.91% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -5.44% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.81% | -0.89% |
Volatility
DIV vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 3.28%. This indicates that DIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.28% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 7.13% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 9.77% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 12.77% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 15.44% | +2.56% |
DIV vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than FVD's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.26% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and FVD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FVD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs FVD's -51.00%.
On 10-year performance, FVD leads with 8.66% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FVD has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 2.26% for FVD.
DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.61% for FVD.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and FVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer