DIV vs. DFND
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 3.95%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DFND. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
DIV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed DFND with an annualized return of 3.95%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
DIV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 11.63% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and DFND is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIV and DFND has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DIV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
DFND
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
DFND
Real Estate
DIV
DFND
Consumer Defensive
DIV
DFND
Utilities
DIV
DFND
-
Industrials
DIV
DFND
Communication Services
DIV
DFND
Basic Materials
DIV
DFND
Financial Services
DIV
DFND
Healthcare
DIV
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
DFND
Technology
DIV
-
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
DFND
DIV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.02 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 0.07 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 0.13 | +7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.02 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.21 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.38 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
DIV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -22.65% | -30.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -3.44% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -12.56% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -22.65% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -22.65% | -30.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -3.69% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -5.70% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 3.70% | -1.85% |
Volatility
DIV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 0.00% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 6.16% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 10.92% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 22.46% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 19.09% | -1.11% |
DIV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 7.36% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and DFND have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 10-year performance, DFND leads with 7.16% vs 3.95% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DFND has performed better with a 7.16% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
DIV is categorized as Dividend, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 1.50% for DFND.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer