PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIT vs. CLMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DIT vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIT achieves a -15.00% return, which is significantly lower than CLMB's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DIT has underperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 2.18%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively higher 22.82% annualized return.


DIT

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.57%
6M
-14.77%
YTD
-15.00%
1Y
-13.11%
3Y*
-24.19%
5Y*
-9.84%
10Y*
2.18%
ALL TIME*
5.92%

CLMB

1D
1.53%
1M
14.08%
6M
-8.86%
YTD
5.92%
1Y
-1.83%
3Y*
39.60%
5Y*
34.97%
10Y*
22.82%
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.41M$4.23M$3.78M
$462.46K$228.43K$97.63K

DIT vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIT
AMCON Distributing Company
-15.00%-12.81%-33.74%8.14%-6.44%73.39%74.59%-26.99%3.13%-14.29%
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
5.92%-18.40%133.60%76.59%-8.29%88.47%22.14%70.90%-37.08%-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between DIT and CLMB is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 1995

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DIT:

$62.46M

CLMB:

$507.94M

EPS

DIT:

$0.59

CLMB:

$1.13

PE Ratio

DIT:

105.41

CLMB:

24.14

PS Ratio

DIT:

0.02

CLMB:

0.70

PB Ratio

DIT:

0.52

CLMB:

3.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

DIT:

$2.63B

CLMB:

$711.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DIT:

$187.33M

CLMB:

$112.22M

EBITDA (TTM)

DIT:

$21.25M

CLMB:

$35.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIT vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIT
DIT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CLMB
CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIT vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DITCLMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.04

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.03

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-0.06

-0.98

DIT vs. CLMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the CLMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIT and CLMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIT vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIT drawdown since its inception was -82.64%, smaller than the maximum CLMB drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIT and CLMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DITCLMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.64%

-89.12%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.03%

-53.40%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.92%

-53.40%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.92%

-53.40%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.92%

-53.40%

-7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.55%

-23.96%

-36.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-32.23%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

28.43%

-15.81%

Volatility

DIT vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMCON Distributing Company (DIT) is 9.52%, while Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that DIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DITCLMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

13.07%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.03%

41.70%

-10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.18%

50.91%

-11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.94%

45.82%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.51%

41.17%

+9.34%

Dividends

DIT vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison

DIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than CLMB's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
0.31%0.66%0.67%1.24%2.16%1.94%3.56%4.20%6.80%4.07%3.64%3.71%
DIT
AMCON Distributing Company
1.06%0.90%1.00%0.37%3.16%2.87%5.04%1.39%1.00%1.02%0.87%0.90%

Financials

DIT vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AMCON Distributing Company and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DIT and CLMB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLMB has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to DIT (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIT dropped -82.64% vs CLMB's -89.12%.

CLMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIT and CLMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer