DISV vs. FNDC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) and FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. DISV is actively managed, while FNDC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DISV returned 22.26%/yr vs 16.37%/yr for FNDC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DISV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDC.

Performance

DISV vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DISV having a 10.61% return and FNDC slightly lower at 10.15%.

DISV

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 6.74%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 28.67%
• 3Y*: 22.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDC

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: 6.19%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: 8.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISV vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	10.61%	47.42%	5.87%	19.52%	-9.36%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF	10.15%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and FNDC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.95

The correlation between DISV and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DISV vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DISV	FNDC
Basic Materials	18.9%	11.3%
Financial Services	18.3%	11.4%
Industrials	17.8%	25.3%
Consumer Cyclical	15.5%	12.9%
Energy	7.0%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	6.1%
Technology	4.0%	10.1%
Healthcare	3.5%	4.8%
Real Estate	3.0%	6.6%
Utilities	2.7%	2.6%
Communication Services	2.5%	4.7%

Return for Risk

DISV vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISV

DISV Risk / Return Rank: 68
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 73
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 48
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISV vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DISV	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.38	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.98	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.84	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	6.48	+1.50

DISV vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DISV vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum FNDC drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and FNDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DISV	FNDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.77%	-43.22%	+16.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-11.20%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.15%	-12.98%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.13%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-3.15%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-8.40%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	3.17%	+0.43%

Volatility

DISV vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) is 3.58%, while Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that DISV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DISV	FNDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	3.83%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	12.87%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.93%	14.91%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	16.07%	+1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	16.65%	+0.66%

DISV vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DISV vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FNDC's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	2.50%	2.69%	2.77%	2.73%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF	3.69%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DISV and FNDC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DISV and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DISV or FNDC?

FNDC has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to DISV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

Which ETF is better, DISV or FNDC?

On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 22.26% vs 16.37% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DISV or FNDC?

Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 22.26% return vs 16.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DISV or FNDC?

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DISV or FNDC?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.50% for DISV.

What is the main difference between DISV and FNDC?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.39% for FNDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.