DISV vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. DISV is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DISV returned 23.86%/yr vs 45.52%/yr for FLKR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DISV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

DISV vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 98.10% return.

DISV

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 33.75%
• 3Y*: 23.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 98.10%
• 6M: 113.45%
• 1Y: 191.57%
• 3Y*: 45.52%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISV vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	11.15%	47.42%	5.87%	19.52%	-9.36%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	98.10%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-20.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and FLKR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022	0.61

The correlation between DISV and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

DISV vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DISV	FLKR
Financial Services	18.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	18.3%	2.6%
Industrials	18.1%	12.8%
Consumer Cyclical	15.3%	6.0%
Energy	9.2%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	1.5%
Technology	4.1%	64.3%
Communication Services	3.4%	1.6%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Healthcare	3.0%	2.5%
Utilities	2.6%	0.3%

Return for Risk

DISV vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISV

DISV Risk / Return Rank: 70
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISV vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DISV	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	4.08	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.94	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.58	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	8.11	-5.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	28.21	-18.68

DISV vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DISV vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DISV	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.77%	-50.06%	+23.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-23.03%	+10.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.15%	-26.39%	+12.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-9.25%	+7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.89%	-22.03%	+17.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	6.61%	-3.20%

Volatility

DISV vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) is 5.06%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that DISV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DISV	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	25.85%	-20.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	42.11%	-29.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	45.82%	-30.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	29.58%	-12.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.40%	28.37%	-10.97%

DISV vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DISV vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FLKR's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	2.38%	2.69%	2.77%	2.73%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.95%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DISV and FLKR in my portfolio?

DISV and FLKR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DISV or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to DISV (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, DISV or FLKR?

On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 45.52% vs 23.86% for DISV. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DISV or FLKR?

Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 45.52% return vs 23.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DISV or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DISV or FLKR?

DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between DISV and FLKR?

DISV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.