DISO vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. DISO is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, DISO returned -9.02% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. DISO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DISO vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -10.18% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.31% return.

DISO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: -10.18%
• 6M: -8.83%
• 1Y: -9.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISO vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF	-10.18%	1.78%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DISO and RBIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

DISO vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISO vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DISO	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	4.18	-4.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	6.39	-6.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	2.06	-1.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	7.59	-8.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	44.07	-45.15

DISO vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISO and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DISO vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DISO	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	-0.52%	-26.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.08%	-0.52%	-17.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	-0.51%	-12.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-0.07%	-7.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.38%	0.09%	+8.29%

Volatility

DISO vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that DISO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DISO	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	0.36%	+2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.73%	0.85%	+14.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.06%	0.95%	+19.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	1.07%	+20.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.36%	1.07%	+20.29%

DISO vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

DISO vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF	40.16%	38.87%	37.33%	6.87%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DISO and RBIL in my portfolio?

DISO and RBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DISO or RBIL?

DISO has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISO dropped -26.62% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, DISO or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.95% vs -9.02% for DISO. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DISO or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DISO or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DISO or RBIL?

DISO has the higher dividend yield at 40.16%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between DISO and RBIL?

DISO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.