DISO vs. IPDP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. DISO charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

DISO vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DISO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -10.18%
• 1Y: -10.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISO vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF	-4.91%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

DISO vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DISO	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DISO	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.68%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DISO	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.06%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.36%	—	—

DISO vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

DISO vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DISO nor IPDP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF	35.76%	38.87%	37.33%	6.87%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DISO or IPDP?

On fees, DISO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DISO or IPDP?

DISO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DISO or IPDP?

DISO has the higher dividend yield at 35.76%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between DISO and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 1.52% for IPDP.