DIPS vs. YMAG
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - DIPS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.57% vs 27.02% for YMAG. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. DIPS charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
DIPS vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 3.80% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.73% | -31.46% | -23.19% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 3.80% | 18.64% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and YMAG is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | -0.65 |
The correlation between DIPS and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
YMAG
DIPS vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPS | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.29 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.89 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 6.63 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPS | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 1.68 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 1.19 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -25.96% | -33.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.97% | -14.38% | -19.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.85% | -2.71% | -53.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -4.52% | -33.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 4.08% | +15.41% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 3.67%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 3.67% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 11.52% | +9.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.88% | 16.19% | +11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 20.88% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 20.88% | +17.15% |
DIPS vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIPS vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, more than YMAG's 52.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.49% | 96.20% | 24.18% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 52.16% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and YMAG have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to YMAG (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs YMAG's -25.96%.
On 1-year performance, YMAG leads with 27.02% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, DIPS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YMAG has performed better with a 27.02% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIPS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 52.16% for YMAG.
DIPS is categorized as Derivative Income, while YMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer