PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIPS vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIPS vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 18.10% return.


DIPS

1D
-1.25%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-11.23%
1Y
-26.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
2.26%
1M
9.62%
YTD
18.10%
6M
18.53%
1Y
65.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and NVII is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

-0.94

The correlation between DIPS and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIPS vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS
DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIPSNVIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.31

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

3.55

-4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

9.04

-10.42

DIPS vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIPSNVIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.97

1.91

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

2.14

-3.01

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIPSNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.93%

-18.47%

-41.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.97%

-18.47%

-15.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.40%

-6.48%

-49.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.26%

-5.50%

-32.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.57%

7.25%

+12.32%

Volatility

DIPS vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 10.68%, while REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIPSNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

12.30%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.79%

25.32%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

34.37%

-6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.00%

34.53%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.00%

34.53%

+3.47%

DIPS vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIPS and NVII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

DIPS vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.74%, more than NVII's 50.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
68.74%96.20%24.18%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
50.41%29.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIPS and NVII have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to DIPS (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs NVII's -18.47%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 65.30% vs -26.97% for DIPS. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, DIPS has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 65.30% return vs -26.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIPS and NVII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 68.74%, compared with 50.41% for NVII.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX.

NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIPS and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer