DIPS vs. NVII
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and NVII (REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.97% vs 65.30% for NVII. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
DIPS vs. NVII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 18.10% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -11.23%
- 1Y
- -26.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVII
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 9.62%
- YTD
- 18.10%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 65.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -9.87% | -22.01% |
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF | 18.10% | 48.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and NVII is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025 | -0.94 |
The correlation between DIPS and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
NVII
DIPS vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPS | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.31 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 3.55 | -4.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 9.04 | -10.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPS | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 1.91 | -2.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | 2.14 | -3.01 |
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and NVII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -18.47% | -41.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.97% | -18.47% | -15.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.40% | -6.48% | -49.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.26% | -5.50% | -32.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.57% | 7.25% | +12.32% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 10.68%, while REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 12.30%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 12.30% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 25.32% | -4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 34.37% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 34.53% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.00% | 34.53% | +3.47% |
DIPS vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIPS and NVII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
DIPS vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.74%, more than NVII's 50.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 68.74% | 96.20% | 24.18% |
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF | 50.41% | 29.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and NVII have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVII has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to DIPS (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs NVII's -18.47%.
On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 65.30% vs -26.97% for DIPS. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, DIPS has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 65.30% return vs -26.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIPS and NVII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 68.74%, compared with 50.41% for NVII.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX.
NVII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and NVII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer