DINT vs. DBAW
DINT (Davis Select International ETF) and DBAW (Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DINT is actively managed, while DBAW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DINT returned 6.61%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for DBAW. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DINT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DBAW.
Performance
DINT vs. DBAW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DINT achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly lower than DBAW's 16.12% return.
DINT
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 23.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
DBAW
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 16.12%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 36.60%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
DINT vs. DBAW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DINT Davis Select International ETF | 5.16% | 32.66% | 20.56% | 6.73% | -8.56% | -14.93% | 22.78% | 29.39% | -22.38% |
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 16.12% | 26.47% | 14.35% | 16.26% | -13.35% | 13.08% | 7.44% | 22.96% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DINT and DBAW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DINT and DBAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DINT vs. DBAW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DINT
DBAW
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DINT
DBAW
Industrials
DINT
DBAW
Consumer Cyclical
DINT
DBAW
Consumer Defensive
DINT
DBAW
Basic Materials
DINT
DBAW
Energy
DINT
DBAW
Communication Services
DINT
DBAW
Healthcare
DINT
DBAW
Real Estate
DINT
DBAW
Technology
DINT
DBAW
Utilities
DINT
-
DBAW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DINT vs. DBAW — Risk / Return Rank
DINT
DBAW
DINT vs. DBAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select International ETF (DINT) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DINT | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.55 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 4.09 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 16.97 | -11.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DINT | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.86 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.83 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.63 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DINT vs. DBAW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DINT drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, which is greater than DBAW's maximum drawdown of -31.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINT and DBAW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DINT | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -31.44% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -9.00% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -14.11% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.96% | -17.87% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -0.51% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -5.00% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 2.16% | +1.83% |
Volatility
DINT vs. DBAW - Volatility Comparison
Davis Select International ETF (DINT) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) at 4.71%. This indicates that DINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DINT | DBAW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 4.71% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 11.00% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 12.88% | +5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 13.74% | +9.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 15.28% | +7.72% |
DINT vs. DBAW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DINT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBAW's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
DINT vs. DBAW - Dividend Comparison
DINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than DBAW's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBAW Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF | 3.29% | 3.83% | 1.70% | 3.45% | 8.81% | 2.05% | 2.08% | 2.91% | 2.93% | 2.41% | 1.99% | 5.74% |
DINT Davis Select International ETF | 1.58% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 1.75% | 0.37% | 2.15% | 0.27% | 2.58% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DINT and DBAW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DINT has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to DBAW (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINT dropped -45.12% vs DBAW's -31.44%.
On 5-year performance, DBAW leads with 11.32% vs 6.61% for DINT. On fees, DBAW is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DBAW has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBAW has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 6.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBAW is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DINT.
DBAW has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.58% for DINT.
They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DINT and 0.41% for DBAW.
DBAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DINT and DBAW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer