DIN vs. RGP
DIN (Dine Brands Global, Inc.) and RGP (Resources Connection, Inc.) are both stocks. DIN operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while RGP operates in Consulting Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, DIN returned -4.85%/yr vs -8.04%/yr for RGP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIN vs. RGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIN achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than RGP's -14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DIN has outperformed RGP with an annualized return of -4.85%, while RGP has yielded a comparatively lower -8.04% annualized return.
DIN
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.38%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- -4.85%
RGP
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -7.95%
- YTD
- -14.40%
- 6M
- -16.87%
- 1Y
- -15.23%
- 3Y*
- -32.34%
- 5Y*
- -18.49%
- 10Y*
- -8.04%
DIN vs. RGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc. | 4.24% | 14.14% | -35.73% | -20.32% | -12.36% | 31.43% | -27.31% | 28.20% | 37.27% | -28.45% |
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | -14.40% | -37.28% | -36.50% | -20.09% | 6.25% | 47.30% | -19.45% | 18.95% | -5.11% | -17.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIN and RGP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2006 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
DIN:
$419.33M
RGP:
$139.06M
DIN:
$1.18
RGP:
-$2.95
DIN:
0.52
RGP:
0.29
DIN:
$889.72M
RGP:
$485.23M
DIN:
$347.79M
RGP:
$185.73M
DIN:
$120.03M
RGP:
-$12.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIN vs. RGP — Risk / Return Rank
DIN
RGP
DIN vs. RGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIN | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.38 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | -0.65 | +2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIN vs. RGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIN drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than RGP's maximum drawdown of -83.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIN and RGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIN | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.50% | -83.07% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.69% | -39.75% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.64% | -75.92% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.69% | -81.12% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.26% | -81.12% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.93% | -79.30% | +20.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -46.93% | +22.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 23.57% | -6.68% |
Volatility
DIN vs. RGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) is 12.99%, while Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that DIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIN | RGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 14.40% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | 31.99% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.87% | 46.29% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 38.98% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 37.74% | +17.19% |
Dividends
DIN vs. RGP - Dividend Comparison
DIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than RGP's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc. | 2.67% | 5.35% | 6.78% | 4.11% | 3.08% | 0.53% | 1.31% | 3.30% | 3.74% | 7.65% | 4.84% | 4.19% |
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | 6.71% | 6.94% | 6.57% | 3.95% | 3.05% | 3.14% | 4.46% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.18% | 2.20% |
Financials
DIN vs. RGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dine Brands Global, Inc. and Resources Connection, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DIN vs. RGP - Profitability Comparison
DIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.30M and revenue of 225.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
RGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 107.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
DIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.20M and revenue of 225.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
RGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.35M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.
DIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a net income of 7.40M and revenue of 225.20M, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
RGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -9.47M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DIN and RGP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGP has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to DIN (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIN dropped -91.50% vs RGP's -83.07%.
DIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIN and RGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer