DIN vs. SLG
DIN (Dine Brands Global, Inc.) and SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.) are both stocks. DIN operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while SLG operates in REIT - Office (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, DIN returned -4.85%/yr vs -2.08%/yr for SLG. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIN vs. SLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIN achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DIN has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -4.85%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -2.08% annualized return.
DIN
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.38%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- -4.85%
SLG
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 15.78%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- -17.13%
- 3Y*
- 36.21%
- 5Y*
- -3.69%
- 10Y*
- -2.08%
DIN vs. SLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc. | 4.24% | 14.14% | -35.73% | -20.32% | -12.36% | 31.43% | -27.31% | 28.20% | 37.27% | -28.45% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 11.13% | -29.03% | 58.26% | 48.75% | -50.94% | 22.86% | -29.14% | 20.96% | -18.80% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIN and SLG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997 | 0.33 |
The correlation between DIN and SLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DIN:
$419.33M
SLG:
$3.87B
DIN:
$1.18
SLG:
-$2.05
DIN:
0.52
SLG:
3.86
DIN:
$889.72M
SLG:
$993.51M
DIN:
$347.79M
SLG:
$662.81M
DIN:
$120.03M
SLG:
$547.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIN vs. SLG — Risk / Return Rank
DIN
SLG
DIN vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIN | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.38 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | -0.64 | +2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIN vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIN drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIN and SLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIN | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.50% | -94.02% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.69% | -45.40% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.64% | -53.91% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.69% | -74.27% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.26% | -77.70% | -5.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.93% | -36.36% | -22.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -27.45% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 26.90% | -10.01% |
Volatility
DIN vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison
Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) at 10.51%. This indicates that DIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIN | SLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 10.51% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | 28.27% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.87% | 37.94% | +7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.22% | 43.65% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 42.33% | +12.60% |
Dividends
DIN vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison
DIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than SLG's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc. | 2.67% | 5.35% | 6.78% | 4.11% | 3.08% | 0.53% | 1.31% | 3.30% | 3.74% | 7.65% | 4.84% | 4.19% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.32% | 6.18% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 5.09% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% |
Financials
DIN vs. SLG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dine Brands Global, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DIN vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison
DIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.30M and revenue of 225.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
SLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 211.17M and revenue of 253.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
DIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.20M and revenue of 225.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
SLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 188.38M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.
DIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a net income of 7.40M and revenue of 225.20M, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
SLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -84.39M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in a net margin of -33.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DIN and SLG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIN has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to SLG (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIN dropped -91.50% vs SLG's -94.02%.
DIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIN and SLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer