DIN vs. SLG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG).

Performance

DIN vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DIN vs. SLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	-17.81%	14.14%	-35.73%	-20.32%	-12.36%	31.43%	-27.31%	28.20%	37.27%	-28.45%
SLG SL Green Realty Corp.	-18.06%	-29.03%	58.26%	48.75%	-50.94%	22.86%	-29.14%	20.96%	-18.80%	-3.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DIN : $348.99M SLG : $2.60B
EPS DIN : $1.13 SLG : -$1.22
PS Ratio DIN : 0.42 SLG : 2.67
Total Revenue (TTM) DIN : $879.30M SLG : $1.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) DIN : $359.30M SLG : $341.79M
EBITDA (TTM) DIN : $126.72M SLG : $409.72M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIN having a -17.81% return and SLG slightly lower at -18.06%. Over the past 10 years, DIN has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -8.06%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -4.49% annualized return.

DIN

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -14.68%
• YTD: -17.81%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: -23.07%
• 5Y*: -18.88%
• 10Y*: -8.06%

SLG

• 1D: 4.76%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: -18.06%
• 6M: -36.49%
• 1Y: -32.38%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: -7.16%
• 10Y*: -4.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DIN vs. SLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIN

DIN Risk / Return Rank: 54
DIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

SLG

SLG Risk / Return Rank: 12
SLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
SLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SLG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SLG Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIN vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIN	SLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	-0.83	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	-1.07	+2.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.88	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	-0.70	+1.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	-1.40	+2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIN vs. SLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIN and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIN	SLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	-0.83	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	-0.17	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	-0.11	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.13	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between DIN and SLG is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DIN vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

DIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than SLG's 7.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	5.34%	5.35%	6.78%	4.11%	3.08%	0.53%	1.31%	3.30%	3.74%	7.65%	4.84%	4.19%
SLG SL Green Realty Corp.	7.25%	6.18%	4.43%	7.15%	10.94%	5.09%	7.81%	3.74%	4.16%	3.11%	2.73%	2.23%

Drawdowns

DIN vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIN drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIN and SLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIN	SLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.50%	-94.02%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.69%	-45.40%	+10.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.02%	-74.47%	-3.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.26%	-77.70%	-5.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.62%	-53.08%	-14.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.14%	-27.32%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.29%	22.87%	-9.58%

Volatility

DIN vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) is 13.04%, while SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a volatility of 13.78%. This indicates that DIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIN	SLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.04%	13.78%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.04%	27.42%	+4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.92%	39.32%	+8.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.53%	43.32%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.42%	42.00%	+12.42%

Financials

DIN vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dine Brands Global, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 94.62M and revenue of 217.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.

SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of -130.89M and revenue of 298.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -43.9%.

DIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 49.03M and revenue of 217.57M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 13.77M and revenue of 298.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

DIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a net income of -13.34M and revenue of 217.57M, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -98.66M and revenue of 298.07M, resulting in a net margin of -33.1%.