PortfoliosLab logo
DIN vs. SLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DIN and SLG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DIN vs. SLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DIN:

-0.63

SLG:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

DIN:

-0.80

SLG:

0.95

Omega Ratio

DIN:

0.92

SLG:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

DIN:

-0.42

SLG:

0.46

Martin Ratio

DIN:

-1.25

SLG:

1.11

Ulcer Index

DIN:

26.20%

SLG:

17.26%

Daily Std Dev

DIN:

51.40%

SLG:

36.53%

Max Drawdown

DIN:

-91.50%

SLG:

-94.03%

Current Drawdown

DIN:

-71.84%

SLG:

-28.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DIN:

$381.58M

SLG:

$4.42B

EPS

DIN:

$3.62

SLG:

-$0.41

PEG Ratio

DIN:

2.55

SLG:

0.95

PS Ratio

DIN:

0.46

SLG:

6.81

PB Ratio

DIN:

0.00

SLG:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

DIN:

$820.85M

SLG:

$938.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DIN:

$368.20M

SLG:

$521.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

DIN:

$189.86M

SLG:

$426.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIN achieves a -18.40% return, which is significantly lower than SLG's -14.58% return. Over the past 10 years, DIN has underperformed SLG with an annualized return of -9.41%, while SLG has yielded a comparatively higher -2.29% annualized return.


DIN

YTD

-18.40%

1M

17.48%

6M

-30.44%

1Y

-34.73%

3Y*

-27.86%

5Y*

-9.27%

10Y*

-9.41%

SLG

YTD

-14.58%

1M

6.54%

6M

-25.51%

1Y

12.39%

3Y*

4.91%

5Y*

13.71%

10Y*

-2.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dine Brands Global, Inc.

SL Green Realty Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DIN vs. SLG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DIN is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DIN is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DIN is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DIN is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DIN is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DIN is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLG is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLG is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLG is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLG is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DIN vs. SLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DIN Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the SLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIN and SLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DIN vs. SLG - Dividend Comparison

DIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than SLG's 5.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DIN
Dine Brands Global, Inc.
8.48%6.78%4.11%3.08%0.53%1.31%3.30%3.74%7.65%4.84%4.19%3.02%
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
5.36%4.43%7.15%10.94%8.49%7.81%3.73%4.15%3.11%2.73%2.23%1.76%

Drawdowns

DIN vs. SLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIN drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SLG drawdown of -94.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIN and SLG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DIN vs. SLG - Volatility Comparison

Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) at 9.30%. This indicates that DIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DIN vs. SLG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dine Brands Global, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20212022202320242025
214.78M
239.85M
(DIN) Total Revenue
(SLG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DIN vs. SLG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dine Brands Global, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
42.1%
49.5%
(DIN) Gross Margin
(SLG) Gross Margin
DIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.31M and revenue of 214.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.1%.

SLG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.74M and revenue of 239.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

DIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.26M and revenue of 214.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

SLG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 49.01M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

DIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Dine Brands Global, Inc. reported a net income of 8.20M and revenue of 214.78M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

SLG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -15.18M and revenue of 239.85M, resulting in a net margin of -6.3%.