DIN vs. SWLGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).

SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.

Performance

DIN vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DIN vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	-17.81%	14.14%	-35.73%	-20.32%	-12.36%	31.43%	-27.31%	28.20%	37.27%	2.13%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	-13.06%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIN achieves a -17.81% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.

DIN

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -14.68%
• YTD: -17.81%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: -23.07%
• 5Y*: -18.88%
• 10Y*: -8.06%

SWLGX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -8.63%
• YTD: -13.06%
• 6M: -12.07%
• 1Y: 14.45%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 11.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DIN vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIN

DIN Risk / Return Rank: 54
DIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DIN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIN vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIN	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	0.66	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.10	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.15	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	0.72	-0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.34	2.51	-1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIN vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIN and SWLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIN	SWLGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	0.66	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	0.56	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.68	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between DIN and SWLGX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DIN vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

DIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.	5.34%	5.35%	6.78%	4.11%	3.08%	0.53%	1.31%	3.30%	3.74%	7.65%	4.84%	4.19%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.52%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DIN vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIN drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIN and SWLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIN	SWLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.50%	-32.69%	-58.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.69%	-16.16%	-18.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.02%	-32.69%	-45.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-83.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.62%	-16.16%	-51.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.14%	-7.13%	-17.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.29%	4.62%	+8.67%

Volatility

DIN vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that DIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIN	SWLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.04%	5.38%	+7.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.04%	11.82%	+20.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.92%	22.31%	+25.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.53%	21.47%	+22.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.42%	22.78%	+31.64%