RGP vs. MDU
RGP (Resources Connection, Inc.) and MDU (MDU Resources Group, Inc.) are both stocks. RGP operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while MDU operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, RGP returned -8.22%/yr vs 12.25%/yr for MDU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGP vs. MDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGP achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly lower than MDU's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RGP has underperformed MDU with an annualized return of -8.22%, while MDU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
RGP
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -16.04%
- 6M
- -19.55%
- 1Y
- -17.33%
- 3Y*
- -32.77%
- 5Y*
- -18.62%
- 10Y*
- -8.22%
MDU
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 36.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
RGP vs. MDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | -16.04% | -37.28% | -36.50% | -20.09% | 6.25% | 47.30% | -19.45% | 18.95% | -5.11% | -17.11% |
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 10.07% | 11.77% | 68.01% | -1.94% | 1.46% | 20.37% | -8.31% | 28.44% | -8.64% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGP and MDU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2006 | 0.38 |
The correlation between RGP and MDU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGP:
$136.39M
MDU:
$4.39B
RGP:
-$2.95
MDU:
$0.92
RGP:
0.28
MDU:
2.42
RGP:
0.73
MDU:
1.51
RGP:
$485.23M
MDU:
$1.81B
RGP:
$185.73M
MDU:
$848.35M
RGP:
-$12.52M
MDU:
$528.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGP vs. MDU — Risk / Return Rank
RGP
MDU
RGP vs. MDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) and MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGP | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.30 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.78 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 7.98 | -8.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGP vs. MDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGP drawdown since its inception was -83.07%, which is greater than MDU's maximum drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGP and MDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGP | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.07% | -62.17% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.75% | -9.70% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.92% | -21.48% | -54.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.12% | -22.69% | -58.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.12% | -51.41% | -29.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.69% | -6.40% | -73.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.92% | -14.32% | -32.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.52% | 4.59% | +18.93% |
Volatility
RGP vs. MDU - Volatility Comparison
Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a higher volatility of 14.60% compared to MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) at 5.48%. This indicates that RGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGP | MDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.60% | 5.48% | +9.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.93% | 14.26% | +17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.34% | 21.64% | +24.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.97% | 22.99% | +15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 27.12% | +10.63% |
Dividends
RGP vs. MDU - Dividend Comparison
RGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than MDU's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDU MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 2.64% | 2.77% | 1.89% | 3.16% | 2.88% | 2.77% | 3.17% | 2.74% | 3.33% | 2.88% | 2.62% | 4.01% |
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | 6.85% | 6.94% | 6.57% | 3.95% | 3.05% | 3.14% | 4.46% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.18% | 2.20% |
Financials
RGP vs. MDU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Resources Connection, Inc. and MDU Resources Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGP vs. MDU - Profitability Comparison
RGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 107.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
MDU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 491.20M and revenue of 606.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.
RGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.35M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.
MDU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.70M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
RGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -9.47M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
MDU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDU Resources Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.80M and revenue of 606.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGP and MDU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGP has higher volatility (14.60%) compared to MDU (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGP dropped -83.07% vs MDU's -62.17%.
MDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGP and MDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer