RGP vs. SON
RGP (Resources Connection, Inc.) and SON (Sonoco Products Company) are both stocks. RGP operates in Consulting Services (Industrials), while SON operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RGP returned -8.04%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for SON. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGP vs. SON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGP achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than SON's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, RGP has underperformed SON with an annualized return of -8.04%, while SON has yielded a comparatively higher 4.29% annualized return.
RGP
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -7.95%
- YTD
- -14.40%
- 6M
- -16.87%
- 1Y
- -15.23%
- 3Y*
- -32.34%
- 5Y*
- -18.49%
- 10Y*
- -8.04%
SON
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 20.20%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
RGP vs. SON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | -14.40% | -37.28% | -36.50% | -20.09% | 6.25% | 47.30% | -19.45% | 18.95% | -5.11% | -17.11% |
SON Sonoco Products Company | 18.71% | -6.30% | -9.12% | -4.69% | 8.30% | 0.53% | -0.73% | 19.53% | 3.06% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGP and SON is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2006 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RGP and SON has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RGP:
$139.06M
SON:
$5.06B
RGP:
-$2.95
SON:
$10.39
RGP:
0.29
SON:
0.68
RGP:
0.74
SON:
1.41
RGP:
$485.23M
SON:
$7.49B
RGP:
$185.73M
SON:
$1.57B
RGP:
-$12.52M
SON:
$1.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGP vs. SON — Risk / Return Rank
RGP
SON
RGP vs. SON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) and Sonoco Products Company (SON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGP | SON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.16 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.17 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 2.29 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGP vs. SON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGP drawdown since its inception was -83.07%, which is greater than SON's maximum drawdown of -65.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGP and SON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGP | SON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.07% | -65.36% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.75% | -18.40% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.92% | -32.46% | -43.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.12% | -32.94% | -48.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.12% | -41.57% | -39.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.30% | -11.33% | -67.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.93% | -18.77% | -28.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.57% | 9.41% | +14.16% |
Volatility
RGP vs. SON - Volatility Comparison
Resources Connection, Inc. (RGP) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to Sonoco Products Company (SON) at 7.75%. This indicates that RGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGP | SON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 7.75% | +6.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.99% | 27.21% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.29% | 31.33% | +14.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 25.73% | +13.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.74% | 25.72% | +12.02% |
Dividends
RGP vs. SON - Dividend Comparison
RGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than SON's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGP Resources Connection, Inc. | 6.71% | 6.94% | 6.57% | 3.95% | 3.05% | 3.14% | 4.46% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.98% | 2.18% | 2.20% |
SON Sonoco Products Company | 4.19% | 4.84% | 4.24% | 3.62% | 3.16% | 3.11% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.05% | 2.90% | 2.77% | 3.35% |
Financials
RGP vs. SON - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Resources Connection, Inc. and Sonoco Products Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGP vs. SON - Profitability Comparison
RGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.58M and revenue of 107.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
SON - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a gross profit of 345.63M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
RGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.35M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.7%.
SON - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported an operating income of 127.09M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
RGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Resources Connection, Inc. reported a net income of -9.47M and revenue of 107.93M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
SON - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sonoco Products Company reported a net income of 67.60M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGP and SON have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGP has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to SON (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGP dropped -83.07% vs SON's -65.36%.
SON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGP and SON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer