DIHP vs. SPDW
DIHP (Dimensional International High Profitability ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DIHP is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIHP returned 14.52%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for SPDW. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DIHP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
DIHP vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIHP achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.
DIHP
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDW
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
DIHP vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF | 8.04% | 28.26% | 0.50% | 19.07% | -10.88% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 15.00% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | -10.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIHP and SPDW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between DIHP and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIHP vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIHP
SPDW
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
DIHP
SPDW
Technology
DIHP
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
DIHP
SPDW
Healthcare
DIHP
SPDW
Financial Services
DIHP
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
DIHP
SPDW
Basic Materials
DIHP
SPDW
Energy
DIHP
SPDW
Communication Services
DIHP
SPDW
Utilities
DIHP
SPDW
Real Estate
DIHP
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIHP vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
DIHP
SPDW
DIHP vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIHP | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.80 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 10.93 | -4.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIHP | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.07 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.24 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
DIHP vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIHP drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIHP and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIHP | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.94% | -60.02% | +35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -11.55% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.42% | -13.53% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -0.87% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -12.91% | +8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.95% | +0.03% |
Volatility
DIHP vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) is 4.27%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that DIHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIHP | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 5.63% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 13.17% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 15.60% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.49% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.26% | -1.01% |
DIHP vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIHP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIHP vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
DIHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIHP Dimensional International High Profitability ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.17% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DIHP and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DIHP (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIHP dropped -24.94% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 3-year performance, SPDW leads with 19.77% vs 14.52% for DIHP. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DIHP has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 14.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for DIHP.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.02% for DIHP.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DIHP and 0.04% for SPDW.
SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIHP and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer