PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIAL vs. RFCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIAL vs. RFCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIAL achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than RFCI's 0.13% return.


DIAL

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.88%
6M
0.93%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*

RFCI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.05%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIAL vs. RFCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIAL
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
0.88%9.93%1.69%8.54%-16.13%-1.14%9.08%14.05%-1.98%0.00%
RFCI
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
0.13%6.85%2.64%5.97%-9.27%-1.48%6.48%8.69%-1.30%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DIAL and RFCI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2017

0.72

The correlation between DIAL and RFCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIAL vs. RFCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIAL
DIAL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DIAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DIAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

RFCI
RFCI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RFCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIAL vs. RFCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIALRFCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.74

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

5.23

+2.56

DIAL vs. RFCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RFCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIAL and RFCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIALRFCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.31

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.24

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Drawdowns

DIAL vs. RFCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIAL drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than RFCI's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIAL and RFCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIALRFCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.19%

-14.18%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-2.65%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-5.10%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-13.46%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-1.38%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-3.23%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.88%

-0.02%

Volatility

DIAL vs. RFCI - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF (DIAL) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) at 1.29%. This indicates that DIAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIALRFCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.29%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

2.70%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

3.53%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.03%

5.13%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.03%

4.95%

+2.08%

DIAL vs. RFCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RFCI's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIAL vs. RFCI - Dividend Comparison

DIAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than RFCI's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIAL
Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF
5.05%4.81%4.67%3.77%3.47%2.46%2.61%3.27%3.56%0.65%0.00%
RFCI
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF
4.54%4.55%4.30%3.55%2.26%3.45%2.04%2.66%2.76%2.03%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIAL and RFCI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIAL has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to RFCI (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIAL dropped -22.19% vs RFCI's -14.18%.

On 5-year performance, RFCI leads with 1.22% vs 0.73% for DIAL. On fees, DIAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFCI has performed better with a 1.22% return vs 0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.

DIAL has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 4.54% for RFCI.

They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DIAL and 0.54% for RFCI.

DIAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIAL and RFCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer