PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHT vs. ECO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHT vs. ECO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHT achieves a 54.52% return, which is significantly lower than ECO's 73.56% return.


DHT

1D
4.90%
1M
6.67%
6M
40.59%
YTD
54.52%
1Y
74.34%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
32.02%
10Y*
22.43%

ECO

1D
5.19%
1M
10.41%
6M
54.36%
YTD
73.56%
1Y
156.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHT vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
54.52%40.04%3.58%0.20%
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
73.56%71.94%-11.70%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DHT and ECO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023

0.75

The correlation between DHT and ECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHT:

$2.86B

ECO:

$1.80B

EPS

DHT:

$2.06

ECO:

$5.73

PE Ratio

DHT:

8.62

ECO:

9.59

PEG Ratio

DHT:

0.29

ECO:

0.91

PS Ratio

DHT:

5.05

ECO:

3.96

PB Ratio

DHT:

2.32

ECO:

2.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHT:

$566.07M

ECO:

$481.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHT:

$268.69M

ECO:

$274.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

DHT:

$450.13M

ECO:

$284.05M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHT vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ECO
ECO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHT vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHTECODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

9.25

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

25.78

-15.01

DHT vs. ECO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the ECO Sharpe Ratio of 3.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHT and ECO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHT vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHT drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than ECO's maximum drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHT and ECO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHTECODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-46.15%

-50.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-17.66%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.33%

-3.00%

-61.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.31%

-14.89%

-61.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

6.33%

+0.86%

Volatility

DHT vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison

DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) have volatilities of 16.06% and 15.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHTECODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

15.55%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.23%

31.07%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.01%

41.32%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.70%

42.27%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.66%

42.27%

-0.61%

Dividends

DHT vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison

DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.28%, less than ECO's 9.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
8.28%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%
ECO
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp
9.10%6.26%15.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DHT vs. ECO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
186.48M
170.17M
(DHT) Total Revenue
(ECO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DHT vs. ECO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
60.4%
64.5%
Portfolio components
DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

ECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

ECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.

ECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHT and ECO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHT has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to ECO (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHT dropped -97.12% vs ECO's -46.15%.

ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHT and ECO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer