PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS vs. CDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of 9.47%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.


DHS

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.38%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
9.47%

CDL

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.31%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
9.88%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
10.43%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and CDL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.90

The correlation between DHS and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DHS vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DHS
CDL

Financial Services

22.3%
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
15.9%

Healthcare

14.5%
6.8%

Energy

9.4%
9.5%

Communication Services

9.3%
4.4%

Utilities

9.0%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
6.6%

Industrials

4.1%
2.3%

Technology

3.7%
6.9%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

DHS
22.3%
CDL
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

DHS
18.7%
CDL
15.9%

Healthcare

DHS
14.5%
CDL
6.8%

Energy

DHS
9.4%
CDL
9.5%

Communication Services

DHS
9.3%
CDL
4.4%

Utilities

DHS
9.0%
CDL
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DHS
5.0%
CDL
6.6%

Industrials

DHS
4.1%
CDL
2.3%

Technology

DHS
3.7%
CDL
6.9%

Real Estate

DHS
2.8%
CDL
0.0%

Basic Materials

DHS
1.2%
CDL
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHSCDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.20

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

11.35

+0.69

DHS vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and CDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHSCDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.86

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.63

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.65

-0.24

Drawdowns

DHS vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than CDL's maximum drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and CDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSCDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-41.03%

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-5.66%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-12.87%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-17.28%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

-41.03%

+3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.19%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-4.35%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.59%

+0.12%

Volatility

DHS vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 2.66%. This indicates that DHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSCDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.66%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.32%

6.86%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

9.75%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

13.85%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

17.04%

-0.96%

DHS vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than CDL's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.35%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DHS and CDL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DHS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CDL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs CDL's -41.03%.

On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 10.83% vs 9.47% for DHS. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 10.83% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.17% for CDL.

DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.35% for CDL.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS and CDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer