DHS vs. CDL
DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while CDL is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DHS returned 9.68%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for CDL. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CDL.
Performance
DHS vs. CDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DHS having a 16.66% return and CDL slightly higher at 17.17%. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of 9.68%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.
DHS
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.24%
CDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.48K | $625.50K | $553.90K | |
| $5.32M | $3.61M | $2.98M |
DHS vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 16.66% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.17% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and CDL is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DHS and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DHS vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DHS
CDL
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DHS
CDL
Healthcare
DHS
CDL
Consumer Defensive
DHS
CDL
Utilities
DHS
CDL
Energy
DHS
CDL
Communication Services
DHS
CDL
Technology
DHS
CDL
Consumer Cyclical
DHS
CDL
Industrials
DHS
CDL
Real Estate
DHS
CDL
Basic Materials
DHS
CDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
CDL
DHS vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 3.87 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.58 | 13.78 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than CDL's maximum drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and CDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -41.03% | -26.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -5.66% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -12.87% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -17.28% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | -41.03% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -2.35% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -4.29% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.59% | +0.12% |
Volatility
DHS vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.88%, while VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.20% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.92% | 7.85% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 10.34% | +0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 13.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 17.04% | -0.95% |
DHS vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than CDL's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.06% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.19% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DHS and CDL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to DHS (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs CDL's -41.03%.
On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 11.17% vs 9.68% for DHS. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.06% for CDL.
DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CDL is Dividend. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.35% for CDL.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHS and CDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer