CDL vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
CDL and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CDL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2015. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both CDL and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CDL or OMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between CDL and OMFL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CDL vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CDL:
1.42
OMFL:
0.63
CDL:
2.00
OMFL:
0.92
CDL:
1.25
OMFL:
1.12
CDL:
1.83
OMFL:
0.66
CDL:
6.04
OMFL:
1.96
CDL:
2.55%
OMFL:
4.50%
CDL:
10.91%
OMFL:
14.13%
CDL:
-41.03%
OMFL:
-33.24%
CDL:
-6.80%
OMFL:
-4.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's -0.57% return.
CDL
0.03%
-2.32%
4.88%
15.28%
8.81%
N/A
OMFL
-0.57%
-3.91%
4.21%
9.53%
11.34%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CDL vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CDL vs. OMFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CDL
OMFL
CDL vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CDL vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than OMFL's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.60% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 0.92% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CDL vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CDL vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is 3.92%, while Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that CDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.