CDL vs. OMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CDL returned 8.68%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for OMFL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for OMFL.

Performance

CDL vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 12.39% return.

CDL

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 10.31%
• 1Y: 18.04%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

OMFL

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	10.43%	9.04%	15.58%	3.03%	-0.45%	33.42%	-3.35%	26.38%	-5.86%	4.11%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	12.39%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	28.95%	20.91%	35.58%	-2.55%	4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and OMFL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between CDL and OMFL has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CDL vs. OMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDL	OMFL
Utilities	24.3%	0.4%
Financial Services	23.4%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	15.9%	8.8%
Energy	9.5%	3.7%
Technology	6.9%	31.0%
Healthcare	6.8%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	9.5%
Communication Services	4.4%	11.7%
Industrials	2.3%	9.8%
Basic Materials	0.0%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

CDL vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL

CDL Risk / Return Rank: 58
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 57
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CDL	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.84	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.57	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	2.91	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.35	13.12	-1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CDL vs. OMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and OMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CDL	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.84	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.56	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.70	-0.06

Drawdowns

CDL vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and OMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDL	OMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.03%	-33.24%	-7.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-7.58%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.87%	-15.52%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.28%	-22.44%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-0.19%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-4.80%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.68%	-0.09%

Volatility

CDL vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 2.40%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDL	OMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.40%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	9.45%	-2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	12.03%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	16.75%	-2.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.04%	20.11%	-3.07%

CDL vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDL vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than OMFL's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF	3.17%	3.33%	3.27%	3.61%	3.31%	2.60%	3.32%	3.04%	3.32%	2.87%	2.97%	1.28%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.75%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDL and OMFL in my portfolio?

CDL and OMFL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDL or OMFL?

CDL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs OMFL's -33.24%.

Which ETF is better, CDL or OMFL?

On 5-year performance, OMFL leads with 9.27% vs 8.68% for CDL. On fees, OMFL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDL or OMFL?

Over the 5-year period, OMFL has performed better with a 9.27% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDL or OMFL?

OMFL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDL or OMFL?

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between CDL and OMFL?

CDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while OMFL is Large Cap Blend Equities. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.29% for OMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.