DHR vs. BIL
DHR (Danaher Corporation) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, DHR returned 11.64%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DHR vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -17.32% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 11.64%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
DHR
- 1D
- 5.53%
- 1M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- -17.32%
- 6M
- -18.12%
- 1Y
- -3.70%
- 3Y*
- -3.13%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
DHR vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | -17.32% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.69% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHR and BIL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007 | -0.04 |
The correlation between DHR and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHR vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
DHR
BIL
DHR vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -19.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -173.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 87.41 | -86.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 353.28 | -353.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 2,801.36 | -2,801.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHR vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.80% | -0.78% | -45.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.97% | -0.01% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.72% | -0.01% | -41.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | -0.09% | -43.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -0.21% | -43.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.45% | 0.00% | -34.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -0.26% | -9.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.46% | 0.00% | +14.46% |
Volatility
DHR vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that DHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHR | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 0.07% | +10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | 0.14% | +19.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 0.20% | +28.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 0.26% | +27.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 0.26% | +25.35% |
Dividends
DHR vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than BIL's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.85% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.72% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHR and BIL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHR has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to BIL (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHR dropped -45.80% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.43 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHR and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer