DHR vs. RMD
DHR (Danaher Corporation) and RMD (ResMed Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — DHR in Diagnostics & Research, RMD in Medical Instruments & Supplies. Over the past 10 years, DHR returned 11.08%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for RMD. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DHR vs. RMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -14.47% return, which is significantly lower than RMD's -11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has underperformed RMD with an annualized return of 11.08%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.
DHR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- -4.26%
- 5Y*
- -5.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.08%
RMD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 1Y
- -23.69%
- 3Y*
- -1.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.81B | $1.26B | $962.73M | |
RMD ResMed Inc. | $221.77M | $287.46M | $300.95M |
DHR vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | -14.47% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | -11.95% | 6.26% | 34.18% | -16.55% | -19.47% | 23.41% | 38.33% | 37.85% | 36.38% | 39.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHR and RMD is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1995 | 0.34 |
The correlation between DHR and RMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DHR:
$137.13B
RMD:
$30.60B
DHR:
$5.63
RMD:
$15.50
DHR:
34.62
RMD:
13.61
DHR:
5.52
RMD:
3.73
DHR:
$25.11B
RMD:
$5.54B
DHR:
$14.69B
RMD:
$3.42B
DHR:
$6.43B
RMD:
$2.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHR vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank
DHR
RMD
DHR vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.88 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.58 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | -1.08 | +1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHR vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -45.80%, smaller than the maximum RMD drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and RMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.80% | -61.61% | +15.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.97% | -37.28% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.72% | -37.28% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.81% | -53.99% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -53.99% | +10.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.19% | -27.62% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -16.06% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.66% | 20.03% | -4.37% |
Volatility
DHR vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison
Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a higher volatility of 15.48% compared to ResMed Inc. (RMD) at 12.95%. This indicates that DHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHR | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.48% | 12.95% | +2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 23.18% | +1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.20% | 27.51% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 31.52% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.01% | 31.69% | -5.68% |
Dividends
DHR vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison
DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than RMD's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.74% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.14% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
Financials
DHR vs. RMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaher Corporation and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DHR vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 6.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
RMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.
RMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 870.00M and revenue of 6.27B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
RMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DHR and RMD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHR has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to RMD (12.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHR dropped -45.80% vs RMD's -61.61%.
DHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHR and RMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer