DHR vs. ABT
Compare and contrast key facts about Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DHR or ABT.
Correlation
The correlation between DHR and ABT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DHR vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DHR:
-0.69
ABT:
1.00
DHR:
-0.84
ABT:
1.58
DHR:
0.89
ABT:
1.19
DHR:
-0.54
ABT:
0.75
DHR:
-1.56
ABT:
2.36
DHR:
10.58%
ABT:
8.14%
DHR:
23.83%
ABT:
19.13%
DHR:
-65.35%
ABT:
-45.66%
DHR:
-28.45%
ABT:
0.00%
Fundamentals
DHR:
$147.40B
ABT:
$229.17B
DHR:
$5.29
ABT:
$7.64
DHR:
38.75
ABT:
17.29
DHR:
3.85
ABT:
2.34
DHR:
$23.88B
ABT:
$30.98B
DHR:
$14.21B
ABT:
$17.29B
DHR:
$6.75B
ABT:
$7.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHR achieves a -9.41% return, which is significantly lower than ABT's 18.35% return. Over the past 10 years, DHR has outperformed ABT with an annualized return of 19.38%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.07% annualized return.
DHR
-9.41%
-14.81%
-22.19%
-16.68%
8.15%
19.38%
ABT
18.35%
14.03%
19.99%
15.29%
10.75%
13.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DHR vs. ABT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DHR
ABT
DHR vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DHR vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than ABT's 1.68% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.52% | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 36.46% | 0.80% | 0.47% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 1.68% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
DHR vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHR drawdown since its inception was -65.35%, which is greater than ABT's maximum drawdown of -45.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHR and ABT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DHR vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a higher volatility of 11.54% compared to Abbott Laboratories (ABT) at 7.50%. This indicates that DHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
DHR vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Danaher Corporation and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities