PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHIL vs. TRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHIL vs. TRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DHIL

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TRI

1D
-0.71%
1M
10.00%
6M
-9.97%
YTD
-24.48%
1Y
-50.08%
3Y*
-8.61%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$223.40M$210.33M$189.87M

DHIL vs. TRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
3.24%17.79%-2.70%-7.25%0.41%44.90%14.89%0.17%-24.22%1.54%
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp
-24.48%-16.57%11.14%30.31%-3.01%49.18%16.71%51.59%14.56%2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DHIL and TRI is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2002

0.24

The correlation between DHIL and TRI shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHIL:

$473.29M

TRI:

$42.84B

EPS

DHIL:

$17.25

TRI:

$3.43

PE Ratio

DHIL:

10.15

TRI:

28.59

PS Ratio

DHIL:

3.26

TRI:

5.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHIL:

$145.89M

TRI:

$7.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHIL:

$75.71M

TRI:

$4.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

DHIL:

$52.01M

TRI:

$3.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHIL vs. TRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TRI
TRI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHIL vs. TRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHILTRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.15

DHIL vs. TRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHIL vs. TRI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHILTRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.50%

Volatility

DHIL vs. TRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHILTRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

Dividends

DHIL vs. TRI - Dividend Comparison

DHIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, which matches TRI's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
4.00%5.90%3.87%3.62%5.40%11.84%8.04%6.41%5.35%3.39%2.85%2.65%
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp
4.04%1.80%1.35%4.68%1.56%1.76%1.86%2.01%2.87%3.17%3.11%3.54%

Financials

DHIL vs. TRI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DHIL vs. TRI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DHIL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.09M and revenue of 41.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.7%.

TRI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a gross profit of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.

DHIL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.83M and revenue of 41.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

TRI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported an operating income of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.

DHIL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. reported a net income of 13.55M and revenue of 41.42M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.

TRI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a net income of 452.64M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHIL and TRI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHIL and TRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer