DHIL vs. TRI
Compare and contrast key facts about Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI).
Performance
DHIL vs. TRI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DHIL vs. TRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHIL Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. | 1.53% | 17.79% | -2.70% | -7.25% | 0.41% | 44.90% | 14.89% | 0.17% | -24.22% | 1.54% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -31.26% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
Fundamentals
DHIL:
$17.24
TRI:
$3.34
DHIL:
9.98
TRI:
26.90
DHIL:
3.21
TRI:
5.31
DHIL:
$145.89M
TRI:
$7.61B
DHIL:
$75.71M
TRI:
$2.00B
DHIL:
$52.01M
TRI:
$2.34B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHIL achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than TRI's -31.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DHIL has underperformed TRI with an annualized return of 5.64%, while TRI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
DHIL
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 28.48%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
TRI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -31.26%
- 6M
- -41.38%
- 1Y
- -46.95%
- 3Y*
- -10.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHIL vs. TRI — Risk / Return Rank
DHIL
TRI
DHIL vs. TRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHIL | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | -1.25 | +1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | -1.91 | +4.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.74 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.75 | +1.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | -1.47 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHIL | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | -1.25 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.08 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.48 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.31 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DHIL and TRI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DHIL vs. TRI - Dividend Comparison
DHIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than TRI's 2.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHIL Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. | 4.94% | 5.90% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 5.40% | 11.84% | 8.04% | 6.41% | 5.35% | 3.39% | 2.85% | 2.65% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 2.71% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
DHIL vs. TRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHIL drawdown since its inception was -94.57%, which is greater than TRI's maximum drawdown of -61.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHIL and TRI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHIL | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.57% | -61.67% | -32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -61.67% | +38.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.50% | -61.67% | +28.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.65% | -61.67% | +4.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -57.34% | +56.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.84% | -11.19% | -16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.26% | 31.50% | -22.24% |
Volatility
DHIL vs. TRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (DHIL) is 1.23%, while Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that DHIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DHIL | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 13.46% | -12.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.27% | 32.25% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.76% | 37.73% | +12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.99% | 24.02% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.72% | 22.55% | +7.17% |
Financials
DHIL vs. TRI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities