DGZ vs. CN
Compare and contrast key facts about DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).
DGZ and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DGZ is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index - Optimum Yield Gold Excess Return (-100%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014. Both DGZ and CN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DGZ vs. CN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGZ vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | -9.08% | -32.55% | -16.46% | -4.75% | 4.93% | 1.53% | -20.80% | -13.42% | 4.88% | -11.36% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.10% | -11.87% | -23.85% | -12.74% | 31.55% | 26.79% | -22.41% | 43.69% |
Returns By Period
DGZ
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- -9.08%
- 6M
- -16.77%
- 1Y
- -28.38%
- 3Y*
- -19.40%
- 5Y*
- -13.91%
- 10Y*
- -9.99%
CN
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGZ vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DGZ vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank
DGZ
CN
DGZ vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGZ | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGZ | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between DGZ and CN is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DGZ vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGZ nor CN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGZ DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 0.78% | 4.18% | 2.09% | 0.81% | 11.41% | 14.00% |
Drawdowns
DGZ vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGZ | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.42% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.48% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.88% | — | — |
Volatility
DGZ vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGZ | CN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.50% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.23% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | — | — |