PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGZ vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DGZ vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DGZ vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGZ
DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes
-9.08%-32.55%-16.46%-4.75%4.93%-4.71%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
8.63%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGZ achieves a -9.08% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's 8.63% return.


DGZ

1D
0.81%
1M
11.14%
YTD
-9.08%
6M
-16.77%
1Y
-28.38%
3Y*
-19.40%
5Y*
-13.91%
10Y*
-9.99%

IAUM

1D
3.78%
1M
-11.00%
YTD
8.63%
6M
21.30%
1Y
49.82%
3Y*
33.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DGZ vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DGZ vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGZ
DGZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGZ vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGZIAUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.59

1.82

-2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

2.26

-2.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.33

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

2.72

-3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

10.05

-11.37

DGZ vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGZ and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGZIAUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

1.82

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

1.29

-1.67

Correlation

The correlation between DGZ and IAUM is -0.61. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

DGZ vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGZ nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DGZ vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGZ drawdown since its inception was -86.32%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGZ and IAUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DGZIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.32%

-20.87%

-65.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.53%

-19.15%

-22.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.42%

-13.18%

-71.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.48%

-4.98%

-52.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.88%

5.18%

+16.70%

Volatility

DGZ vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Short Exchange Traded Notes (DGZ) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 10.97%. This indicates that DGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DGZIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.64%

10.97%

+5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.96%

23.96%

+20.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.50%

27.51%

+20.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.23%

17.78%

+10.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

17.78%

+5.25%