PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGTL.L vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGTL.L) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGTL.L achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.33% return.


DGTL.L

1D
1.04%
1M
7.87%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.73%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*

IGV

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.36%
YTD
-5.33%
6M
-7.31%
1Y
-4.52%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
16.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGTL.L
iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc
1.73%3.88%23.09%32.80%-36.42%0.64%41.58%25.49%-5.03%28.64%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
-5.33%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%12.30%52.86%34.33%12.44%42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DGTL.L and IGV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.55

The correlation between DGTL.L and IGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGTL.L
IGV

Technology

38.6%
89.2%

Communication Services

20.0%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

17.4%
0.3%

Industrials

11.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

6.3%

-

Financial Services

6.1%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DGTL.L
38.6%
IGV
89.2%

Communication Services

DGTL.L
20.0%
IGV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DGTL.L
17.4%
IGV
0.3%

Industrials

DGTL.L
11.5%
IGV
0.2%

Real Estate

DGTL.L
6.3%
IGV

-

Financial Services

DGTL.L
6.1%
IGV
1.8%

Healthcare

DGTL.L
0.1%
IGV

-

Consumer Defensive

DGTL.L
0.1%
IGV

-

Basic Materials

DGTL.L

-

IGV

-

Energy

DGTL.L

-

IGV

-

Utilities

DGTL.L

-

IGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGTL.L vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGTL.L
DGTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DGTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGTL.L) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTL.LIGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.99

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

-0.12

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

-0.26

+0.24

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGTL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGTL.L and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTL.LIGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

-0.16

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.24

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.37

+0.07

Drawdowns

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGTL.L drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGTL.L and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTL.LIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.85%

-63.45%

+16.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.84%

-36.61%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.84%

-36.61%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-45.85%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.57%

-15.05%

+8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.96%

-14.45%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

17.25%

-6.70%

Volatility

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc (DGTL.L) is 5.79%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that DGTL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTL.LIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

11.62%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

24.36%

-10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

27.59%

-9.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

27.84%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

26.34%

-5.47%

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGTL.L vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGTL.L nor IGV has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTL.L
iShares Digitalisation UCITS Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGTL.L and IGV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DGTL.L.

DGTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DGTL.L and 0.39% for IGV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGTL.L and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer