DGT vs. DRIV
DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DGT tracks the The Global Dow while DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGT returned 13.59%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
DGT vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
DGT vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -8.00% | 21.50% | 9.67% | 22.19% | -10.18% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGT and DRIV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DGT and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGT vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGT
DRIV
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGT
DRIV
Financial Services
DGT
DRIV
-
Industrials
DGT
DRIV
Healthcare
DGT
DRIV
-
Consumer Defensive
DGT
DRIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
DGT
DRIV
Energy
DGT
DRIV
-
Basic Materials
DGT
DRIV
Communication Services
DGT
DRIV
Utilities
DGT
DRIV
-
Real Estate
DGT
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGT vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
DGT
DRIV
DGT vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.55 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 6.92 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 24.10 | -9.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 3.70 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.35 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.54 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
DGT vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.36% | -41.93% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -13.43% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -34.18% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -41.93% | +16.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.04% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -15.13% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 3.85% | -1.79% |
Volatility
DGT vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is 3.94%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that DGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGT | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 9.36% | -5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 19.29% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 25.14% | -13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 27.07% | -11.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 27.40% | -10.45% |
DGT vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGT vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGT and DRIV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to DGT (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, DGT leads with 13.59% vs 9.49% for DRIV. On fees, DGT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DGT has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGT has performed better with a 13.59% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.
DGT tracks The Global Dow, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGT and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer