DGT vs. CGDV
DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGT is a Global Equities fund tracking the The Global Dow, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. DGT is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGT returned 22.91%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
DGT vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 11.89% return.
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
CGDV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGT vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -4.97% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.89% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGT and CGDV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DGT and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGT vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGT
CGDV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DGT
CGDV
Financial Services
DGT
CGDV
Industrials
DGT
CGDV
Healthcare
DGT
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
DGT
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
DGT
CGDV
Energy
DGT
CGDV
Basic Materials
DGT
CGDV
Communication Services
DGT
CGDV
Utilities
DGT
CGDV
Real Estate
DGT
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGT vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
DGT
CGDV
DGT vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGT | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.18 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 15.06 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGT | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.24 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
DGT vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGT | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.36% | -21.82% | -33.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -9.75% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -14.28% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.55% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -3.62% | -10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility
DGT vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGT | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 3.09% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 9.13% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.59% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 15.48% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 15.48% | +1.47% |
DGT vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGT vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGT and CGDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.14% vs 22.91% for DGT. On fees, CGDV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 22.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGDV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.
DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.
DGT is categorized as Global Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.33% for CGDV.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGT and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer