DGS vs. XC
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC).
DGS and XC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DGS is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2007. XC is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2022. Both DGS and XC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DGS vs. XC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGS vs. XC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 5.34% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | 3.92% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | -3.53% | 18.19% | 5.49% | 21.31% | 1.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than XC's -3.53% return.
DGS
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- 5.34%
- 6M
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 29.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
XC
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGS vs. XC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XC's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DGS vs. XC — Risk / Return Rank
DGS
XC
DGS vs. XC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGS | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 1.07 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.59 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.39 | +1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 5.13 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGS | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.07 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.76 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS and XC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DGS vs. XC - Dividend Comparison
DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than XC's 12.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.49% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.42% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DGS vs. XC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than XC's maximum drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and XC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -20.97% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -12.47% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -9.41% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -3.99% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.39% | -0.43% |
Volatility
DGS vs. XC - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) at 7.82%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGS | XC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 7.82% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 10.76% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 16.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 15.73% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 15.73% | +1.52% |