DGS vs. DFEV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. DGS is passively managed, while DFEV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DGS returned 16.17%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for DFEV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.

Performance

DGS vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 29.46% return.

DGS

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 27.26%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

DFEV

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 29.46%
• 6M: 32.40%
• 1Y: 57.15%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund	14.53%	21.18%	1.13%	19.08%	-7.64%
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	29.46%	32.54%	7.26%	15.52%	-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and DFEV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022	0.92

The correlation between DGS and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DGS vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS

DGS Risk / Return Rank: 51
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DFEV

DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 89
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGS	DFEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	3.32	-1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	4.29	-1.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.61	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	5.06	-2.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	19.06	-9.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGS vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the DFEV Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and DFEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGS	DFEV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	3.32	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	1.11	-0.89

Drawdowns

DGS vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and DFEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGS	DFEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.83%	-18.49%	-43.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.06%	-11.35%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.31%	-17.94%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-1.36%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.59%	-4.65%	-7.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.01%	-0.03%

Volatility

DGS vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) is 5.24%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that DGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGS	DFEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	7.73%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	14.85%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	17.31%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.87%	16.42%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.32%	16.42%	+0.90%

DGS vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGS vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than DFEV's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.02%	2.69%	3.17%	3.47%	3.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund	3.21%	3.45%	3.36%	4.55%	5.34%	3.98%	3.69%	3.95%	4.24%	2.81%	3.42%	3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGS and DFEV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DGS and DFEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DGS or DFEV?

DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs DFEV's -18.49%.

Which ETF is better, DGS or DFEV?

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 25.84% vs 16.17% for DGS. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGS or DFEV?

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 16.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGS or DFEV?

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGS or DFEV?

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.

What is the main difference between DGS and DFEV?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.43% for DFEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.