PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. IQLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than IQLT's 9.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed IQLT with an annualized return of 14.13%, while IQLT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.


DGRW

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.13%

IQLT

1D
0.04%
1M
1.57%
YTD
9.81%
6M
11.22%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.88%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
9.81%25.42%1.54%18.73%-15.22%12.94%12.48%28.18%-10.76%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and IQLT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015

0.70

The correlation between DGRW and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRW vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRW
IQLT

Technology

32.1%
11.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
9.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
24.9%

Communication Services

10.1%
3.2%

Industrials

9.9%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
6.4%

Energy

5.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

3.3%
7.2%

Utilities

0.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

DGRW
32.1%
IQLT
11.8%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
IQLT
9.2%

Financial Services

DGRW
11.3%
IQLT
24.9%

Communication Services

DGRW
10.1%
IQLT
3.2%

Industrials

DGRW
9.9%
IQLT
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
7.1%
IQLT
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
IQLT
6.4%

Energy

DGRW
5.0%
IQLT
5.6%

Basic Materials

DGRW
3.3%
IQLT
7.2%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
IQLT
3.7%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

IQLT
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IQLT
IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRWIQLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.63

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

6.18

+3.09

DGRW vs. IQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the IQLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and IQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, roughly equal to the maximum IQLT drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and IQLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWIQLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-32.21%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-10.38%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-13.18%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-30.24%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-32.21%

+0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.04%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-6.21%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.74%

-0.82%

Volatility

DGRW vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 3.41%, while iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWIQLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

5.41%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

12.72%

-4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

15.00%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

16.55%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

17.00%

-0.77%

DGRW vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than IQLT's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
2.12%2.33%2.87%2.27%3.14%2.24%1.61%2.28%2.72%2.36%2.91%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and IQLT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DGRW (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs IQLT's -32.21%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.13% vs 10.17% for IQLT. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.30% for IQLT.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and IQLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer