DGRW vs. FNDE
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRW returned 14.04%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for FNDE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDE.
Performance
DGRW vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 14.04%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
FNDE
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 15.10%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
DGRW vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 7.69% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 13.53% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | 14.41% | -2.77% | 19.75% | -10.37% | 26.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRW and FNDE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.62 |
The correlation between DGRW and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRW vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRW
FNDE
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGRW
FNDE
Healthcare
DGRW
FNDE
Financial Services
DGRW
FNDE
Communication Services
DGRW
FNDE
Industrials
DGRW
FNDE
Consumer Cyclical
DGRW
FNDE
Consumer Defensive
DGRW
FNDE
Energy
DGRW
FNDE
Basic Materials
DGRW
FNDE
Utilities
DGRW
FNDE
Real Estate
DGRW
-
FNDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRW vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank
DGRW
FNDE
DGRW vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRW | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.10 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 11.21 | -1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRW vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and FNDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRW | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -43.55% | +11.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -10.23% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.21% | -18.40% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -29.44% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.04% | -39.93% | +7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -3.33% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -11.68% | +8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.82% | -0.89% |
Volatility
DGRW vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 3.68%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRW | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 6.14% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 13.20% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.25% | 15.64% | -5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.02% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 19.30% | -3.06% |
DGRW vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRW vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than FNDE's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRW and FNDE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to DGRW (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs FNDE's -43.55%.
On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.04% vs 11.00% for FNDE. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.
DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRW and FNDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer