DGRW vs. FDV
DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. DGRW is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
DGRW vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DGRW
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
FDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRW vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | -1.24% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRW and FDV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.14 |
DGRW vs. FDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRW
FDV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGRW
FDV
Healthcare
DGRW
FDV
Financial Services
DGRW
FDV
Communication Services
DGRW
FDV
Industrials
DGRW
FDV
Consumer Cyclical
DGRW
FDV
Consumer Defensive
DGRW
FDV
Energy
DGRW
FDV
Basic Materials
DGRW
FDV
Utilities
DGRW
FDV
Real Estate
DGRW
-
FDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRW vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
DGRW
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRW vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRW | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRW vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRW | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.04% | -3.33% | -28.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -1.78% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -1.13% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility
DGRW vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRW | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 12.45% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 12.45% | +1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 12.45% | +3.76% |
DGRW vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRW vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than FDV's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.30% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRW and FDV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.27% for FDV.
DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.50% for FDV.
Find the right allocation for DGRW and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer