PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 17.14% return.


DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%

DIVB

1D
1.02%
1M
1.64%
YTD
17.14%
6M
16.48%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%4.88%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
17.14%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and DIVB is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.88

The correlation between DGRW and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRWDIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.08

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

13.64

-4.97

DGRW vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWDIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-36.93%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-6.82%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-15.45%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-21.08%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-1.10%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.97%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.04%

-0.09%

Volatility

DGRW vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 3.75%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWDIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.61%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

8.84%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

11.70%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

15.26%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

18.36%

-2.15%

DGRW vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DIVB's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.27%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and DIVB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to DGRW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs DIVB's -36.93%.

On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.39% vs 11.78% for DGRW. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.05% for DIVB.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer