PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has outperformed DHS with an annualized return of 14.14%, while DHS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


DGRW

1D
-0.92%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
6.36%
6M
5.72%
1Y
16.86%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
14.14%

DHS

1D
0.81%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
12.61%
6M
12.50%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
6.36%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
12.61%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and DHS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRW and DHS has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRW vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRW
DHS

Technology

32.1%
4.1%

Healthcare

12.8%
14.9%

Financial Services

11.3%
22.1%

Communication Services

10.1%
9.0%

Industrials

9.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
18.5%

Energy

5.0%
8.8%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.2%

Utilities

0.2%
8.7%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

DGRW
32.1%
DHS
4.1%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
DHS
14.9%

Financial Services

DGRW
11.3%
DHS
22.1%

Communication Services

DGRW
10.1%
DHS
9.0%

Industrials

DGRW
9.9%
DHS
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
7.1%
DHS
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
DHS
18.5%

Energy

DGRW
5.0%
DHS
8.8%

Basic Materials

DGRW
3.3%
DHS
1.2%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
DHS
8.7%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

DHS
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRWDHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.57

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

12.96

-4.29

DGRW vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and DHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWDHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-67.25%

+35.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-6.30%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-11.87%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-15.28%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-37.35%

+5.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-1.19%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-9.53%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.73%

+0.22%

Volatility

DGRW vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWDHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.61%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

7.53%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.30%

10.20%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

13.88%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.08%

+0.13%

DGRW vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than DHS's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.30%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.27%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and DHS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRW has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DHS (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.14% vs 9.73% for DHS. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.30% for DGRW.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer