PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DGRW vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DGRW vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRW returned 14.13%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for CNX1.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.

Performance

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRW is traded in USD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 16.61% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRW has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 14.13%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.57% annualized return.

DGRW

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.13%

CNX1.L

1D
2.30%
1M
0.52%
YTD
16.61%
6M
17.70%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
16.63%
10Y*
21.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund		7.88%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		16.61%19.98%26.37%55.50%-33.49%28.32%47.63%38.99%-1.30%31.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and CNX1.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.50

The correlation between DGRW and CNX1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DGRW
CNX1.L

Technology

32.1%
60.0%

Healthcare

12.8%
3.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.1%
13.5%

Industrials

9.9%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
6.4%

Energy

5.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.0%

Utilities

0.2%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

DGRW
32.1%
CNX1.L
60.0%

Healthcare

DGRW
12.8%
CNX1.L
3.6%

Financial Services

DGRW
11.3%
CNX1.L
0.2%

Communication Services

DGRW
10.1%
CNX1.L
13.5%

Industrials

DGRW
9.9%
CNX1.L
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRW
7.1%
CNX1.L
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRW
6.7%
CNX1.L
6.4%

Energy

DGRW
5.0%
CNX1.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

DGRW
3.3%
CNX1.L
1.0%

Utilities

DGRW
0.2%
CNX1.L
1.1%

Real Estate

DGRW

-

CNX1.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with DGRW:
DGRW vs. SCHDDGRW vs. DGRODGRW vs. VOODGRW vs. VIGDGRW vs. SPYDGRW vs. VUSA.ASDGRW vs. NOBL
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

Return for Risk

DGRW vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DGRWCNX1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.76
2.21

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.53
3.03

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.21

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.28

11.41

-2.14

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and CNX1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and CNX1.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DGRWCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-35.21%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-10.99%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-23.11%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

-35.21%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

-35.21%

+3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-3.21%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-5.49%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.09%

-1.17%

Volatility

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 3.41%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DGRWCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

5.74%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

12.13%

-4.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

15.97%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

31.46%

-17.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

26.06%

-9.83%

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRW vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund		1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

DGRW and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.36% for CNX1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and CNX1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer