CNX1.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
CNX1.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both CNX1.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNX1.L or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| CNX1.L | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.11% | 4.38% |
| 1Y Return | 33.80% | 35.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.93% | 8.99% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.07% | 18.27% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 21.29% | 18.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 2.12 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.64% | 16.27% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.56% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.35% | -4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNX1.L and QQQ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CNX1.L achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CNX1.L has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 21.29%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 18.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.61%. This indicates that CNX1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.