CNX1.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
CNX1.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both CNX1.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNX1.L or QQQ.
Performance
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CNX1.L having a 22.53% return and QQQ slightly lower at 21.78%. Over the past 10 years, CNX1.L has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 20.21%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 17.95% annualized return.
CNX1.L
22.53%
3.91%
11.09%
27.88%
20.74%
20.21%
QQQ
21.78%
1.15%
10.25%
29.54%
20.42%
17.95%
Key characteristics
| CNX1.L | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.74 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.39 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.27 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.87 | 7.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.06% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.96% | 17.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.56% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -3.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNX1.L has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CNX1.L and QQQ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNX1.L drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNX1.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNX1.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) is 4.94%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that CNX1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.