PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRS has underperformed OUSA with an annualized return of 9.89%, while OUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.


DGRS

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.14%
6M
11.54%
YTD
24.80%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
9.74%

OUSA

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.76%
6M
4.93%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.53%
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.00M$2.54M$1.95M
$787.13K$1.27M$1.35M

DGRS vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
24.80%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
8.40%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and OUSA is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.68

The correlation between DGRS and OUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
OUSA

Financial Services

25.5%
18.6%

Industrials

19.5%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
13.1%

Energy

10.0%

-

Technology

9.1%
23.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
10.3%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Healthcare

1.2%
15.1%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

DGRS
25.5%
OUSA
18.6%

Industrials

DGRS
19.5%
OUSA
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.3%
OUSA
13.1%

Energy

DGRS
10.0%
OUSA

-

Technology

DGRS
9.1%
OUSA
23.7%

Basic Materials

DGRS
8.0%
OUSA

-

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.5%
OUSA
7.4%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
OUSA
10.3%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.9%
OUSA

-

Healthcare

DGRS
1.2%
OUSA
15.1%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGRS vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRSOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

1.97

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

6.89

+3.59

DGRS vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-33.12%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.36%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-13.14%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-19.54%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-33.12%

-11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.04%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-3.49%

-3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.39%

+0.63%

Volatility

DGRS vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.82%. This indicates that DGRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.82%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

8.10%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

10.22%

+6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

13.39%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

15.19%

+8.39%

DGRS vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than OUSA's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.99%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.33%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and OUSA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRS has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to OUSA (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 10-year performance, OUSA leads with 10.53% vs 9.89% for DGRS. On fees, DGRS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OUSA has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.33% for OUSA.

DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.48% for OUSA.

DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer