DGRO vs. VB
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.52%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
DGRO vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 13.52%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 23.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
VB
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 13.69%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
DGRO vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.86% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.33% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and VB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DGRO and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRO vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
VB
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
DGRO
VB
Financial Services
DGRO
VB
Healthcare
DGRO
VB
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
VB
Industrials
DGRO
VB
Utilities
DGRO
VB
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
VB
Energy
DGRO
VB
Basic Materials
DGRO
VB
Communication Services
DGRO
VB
Real Estate
DGRO
-
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
VB
DGRO vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.21 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 11.80 | +1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -59.56% | +24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -8.98% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -25.36% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -28.15% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | -42.05% | +6.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -8.43% | +4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.44% | -0.76% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 5.41% | -2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 12.24% | -5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.59% | 16.68% | -7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 20.80% | -6.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 21.44% | -4.82% |
DGRO vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DGRO vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and VB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VB has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.52% vs 11.61% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.18% for VB.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.05% for VB.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer