DGRO vs. TDVG
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DGRO is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 10.54%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.
Performance
DGRO vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 7.48% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
TDVG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 14.20% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 7.48% | 14.80% | 13.45% | 13.95% | -10.15% | 26.20% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and TDVG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DGRO and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGRO vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
TDVG
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
TDVG
Technology
DGRO
TDVG
Healthcare
DGRO
TDVG
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
TDVG
Industrials
DGRO
TDVG
Utilities
DGRO
TDVG
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
TDVG
Energy
DGRO
TDVG
Basic Materials
DGRO
TDVG
Communication Services
DGRO
TDVG
Real Estate
DGRO
-
TDVG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
TDVG
DGRO vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 2.36 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 9.68 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.77 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and TDVG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -19.20% | -15.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -7.24% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -14.02% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -19.20% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.19% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -3.76% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.76% | -0.09% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | TDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 2.11% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 7.45% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 9.67% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 13.91% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 13.93% | +2.69% |
DGRO vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than TDVG's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.15% | 0.80% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DGRO and TDVG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to TDVG (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs TDVG's -19.20%.
On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 10.03% for TDVG. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.50% for TDVG.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and TDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer