DGRO vs. MTUM

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGRO returned 13.17%/yr vs 16.26%/yr for MTUM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

DGRO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 25.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 13.17%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.26% annualized return.

DGRO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

MTUM

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -6.28%
• 6M: 22.51%
• YTD: 25.16%
• 1Y: 32.74%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 16.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	11.40%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	25.16%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	-18.27%	13.36%	29.86%	27.25%	-1.67%	37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and MTUM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and MTUM has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGRO	MTUM
Technology	22.0%	50.2%
Financial Services	20.6%	5.0%
Healthcare	16.5%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	11.1%	3.7%
Industrials	10.4%	15.0%
Utilities	6.4%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	2.9%
Energy	5.1%	10.5%
Basic Materials	2.4%	2.3%
Communication Services	0.1%	5.1%
Real Estate	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

DGRO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 86
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 56
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGRO	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	1.38	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	1.87	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.26	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	2.85	+0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	9.58	+3.64

DGRO vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRO	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.10%	-34.08%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-11.54%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	-20.99%	+6.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	-32.28%	+12.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	-34.08%	-1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-9.43%	+8.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-6.19%	+2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	3.43%	-1.76%

Volatility

DGRO vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.55%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 12.54%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRO	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	12.54%	-9.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.00%	21.68%	-14.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.53%	23.90%	-14.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	21.57%	-7.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	21.53%	-4.96%

DGRO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DGRO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than MTUM's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.93%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.59%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRO and MTUM in my portfolio?

DGRO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGRO or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to DGRO (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, DGRO or MTUM?

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 16.26% vs 13.17% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGRO or MTUM?

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 16.26% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRO or MTUM?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGRO or MTUM?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.59% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between DGRO and MTUM?

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.15% for MTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.