DGRO vs. HLAL
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DGRO returned 10.54%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
DGRO vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 9.65% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and HLAL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DGRO and HLAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRO vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
HLAL
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
HLAL
Technology
DGRO
HLAL
Healthcare
DGRO
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
HLAL
Industrials
DGRO
HLAL
Utilities
DGRO
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
HLAL
Energy
DGRO
HLAL
Basic Materials
DGRO
HLAL
Communication Services
DGRO
HLAL
Real Estate
DGRO
-
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
HLAL
DGRO vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGRO | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.59 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.30 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 19.85 | -6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGRO | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 3.33 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -33.57% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -10.20% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -21.67% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -23.18% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.07% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -5.00% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 2.20% | -0.53% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.21%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 3.70% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 9.95% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 13.17% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 17.60% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 20.21% | -3.59% |
DGRO vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and HLAL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer