DGRO vs. GPIQ
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. DGRO is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, DGRO returned 20.83% vs 21.40% for GPIQ. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's 10.98% return.
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.47%
GPIQ
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $96.40M | $101.84M | $109.07M | |
| $68.84M | $77.85M | $80.88M |
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 13.15% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 12.17% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.98% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGRO and GPIQ is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.50 |
The correlation between DGRO and GPIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGRO
GPIQ
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DGRO
GPIQ
Healthcare
DGRO
GPIQ
Technology
DGRO
GPIQ
Consumer Defensive
DGRO
GPIQ
Industrials
DGRO
GPIQ
Utilities
DGRO
GPIQ
Consumer Cyclical
DGRO
GPIQ
Energy
DGRO
GPIQ
Basic Materials
DGRO
GPIQ
Communication Services
DGRO
GPIQ
Real Estate
DGRO
-
GPIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGRO vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
DGRO
GPIQ
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGRO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.24 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.28 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 8.75 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGRO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.10% | -21.06% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -9.51% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.47% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -2.30% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.47% | -0.79% |
Volatility
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.81%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGRO | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 6.13% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 13.56% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.52% | 16.22% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 17.97% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 17.97% | -1.40% |
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGRO vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than GPIQ's 10.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.90% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 10.18% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGRO and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to DGRO (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 21.40% vs 20.83% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 20.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.18%, compared with 1.90% for DGRO.
DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.29% for GPIQ.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGRO and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer