DGRO vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DGRO is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

DGRO vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 31.13% return.

DGRO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 1Y: 22.05%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

GARY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 25.08%
• YTD: 31.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	11.40%	0.10%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	31.13%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and GARY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

DGRO vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 86
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGRO	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	—	—

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRO	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.10%	-10.28%	-24.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-4.43%	+3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-1.90%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DGRO	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.53%	21.72%	-12.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	21.72%	-7.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	21.72%	-5.15%

DGRO vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRO vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.93%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRO and GARY in my portfolio?

DGRO and GARY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRO or GARY?

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRO or GARY?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGRO or GARY?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between DGRO and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.77% for GARY.