PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRC.TO vs. DIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while DIVB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DIVB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 21.52% return.


DGRC.TO

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
14.35%
6M
13.66%
1Y
31.08%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*

DIVB

1D
0.35%
1M
4.83%
YTD
21.52%
6M
20.37%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
24.94%
5Y*
15.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF
14.35%27.20%12.36%7.79%-1.70%20.84%7.22%18.60%-4.73%0.11%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
21.52%9.84%28.63%10.58%-4.84%31.23%8.15%27.25%-0.44%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and DIVB is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.54

The correlation between DGRC.TO and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRC.TO
DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGRC.TODIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

4.91

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.60

17.42

+2.18

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the DIVB Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and DIVB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and DIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRC.TODIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.59%

-31.24%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-6.40%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-16.29%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-17.24%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

0.00%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.86%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.80%

-0.21%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.80%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRC.TODIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

4.15%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

9.58%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

12.31%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

16.34%

-3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

19.23%

-4.54%

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than DIVB's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF
2.36%2.58%2.46%2.56%2.48%1.87%3.06%2.20%1.79%0.23%
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.27%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRC.TO and DIVB have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DGRC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.05% for DIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRC.TO and DIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer