PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DGRC.TO vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI Investments, while DGRE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 5 years, DGRC.TO returned 12.71%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for DGRE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while DGRE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 32.98% return.

DGRC.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
2.95%
YTD
14.54%
6M
14.94%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
—

DGRE

1D
-0.54%
1M
10.51%
YTD
32.98%
6M
36.13%
1Y
60.06%
3Y*
26.01%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
10.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		14.54%27.20%12.36%7.79%-1.70%20.84%7.22%18.60%-3.85%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund		32.98%21.63%12.53%15.85%-16.29%1.63%8.97%15.16%-9.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and DGRE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018

0.39

The correlation between DGRC.TO and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DGRC.TO
DGRE

Energy

27.7%
1.1%

Financial Services

24.3%
11.8%

Industrials

16.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
2.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

1.7%
0.8%

Technology

1.2%
38.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.3%

Healthcare

-

2.6%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Energy

DGRC.TO
27.7%
DGRE
1.1%

Financial Services

DGRC.TO
24.3%
DGRE
11.8%

Industrials

DGRC.TO
16.1%
DGRE
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRC.TO
10.7%
DGRE
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRC.TO
10.2%
DGRE
2.7%

Basic Materials

DGRC.TO
8.0%
DGRE
4.4%

Communication Services

DGRC.TO
1.7%
DGRE
0.8%

Technology

DGRC.TO
1.2%
DGRE
38.6%

Real Estate

DGRC.TO
0.1%
DGRE
0.3%

Healthcare

DGRC.TO

-

DGRE
2.6%

Utilities

DGRC.TO

-

DGRE
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund

Often compared with DGRC.TO:
DGRC.TO vs. VDY.TODGRC.TO vs. VYMDGRC.TO vs. RIT.TODGRC.TO vs. ISPA.DEDGRC.TO vs. PDC.TODGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DEDGRC.TO vs. SCHD
Often compared with DGRE:
DGRE vs. DEMDGRE vs. EMXCDGRE vs. IGRODGRE vs. DGRODGRE vs. SCHDDGRE vs. VWODGRE vs. DGRW

Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DGRC.TO
DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DGRC.TODGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.86
3.13

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.88
4.04

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.57

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

4.99

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.77

19.02

+1.75

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DGRC.TODGREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

3.13

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.73

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.61

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.50

+0.31

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than DGRE's maximum drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and DGRE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DGRC.TODGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.59%

-30.62%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-12.10%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-15.94%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-28.28%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-30.62%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.54%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-7.89%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

3.17%

-1.58%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.59%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DGRC.TODGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

8.75%

-6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

17.32%

-8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

19.29%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

16.04%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

17.32%

-2.59%

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than DGRE's 1.18% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		2.41%2.58%2.46%2.56%2.48%1.87%3.06%2.20%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund		1.18%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

DGRC.TO and DGRE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while DGRE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.32% for DGRE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRC.TO and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer