3466.HK vs. 3190.HK

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK).

3466.HK and 3190.HK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3466.HK is a passively managed fund by Hang Seng Investment Management that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2025. 3190.HK is a passively managed fund by Fubon that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong (Selected Corporations) High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2025. Both 3466.HK and 3190.HK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF	6.96%	52.57%
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	8.73%	42.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3466.HK achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than 3190.HK's 8.73% return.

3466.HK

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3190.HK

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 17.57%
• 1Y: 39.03%
• 3Y*: 27.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

3466.HK has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3190.HK's 0.60% expense ratio.

3190.HK

Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF

3466.HK

Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF

Return for Risk

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3190.HK

3190.HK Risk / Return Rank: 91
3190.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
3190.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
3190.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 94
3190.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
3190.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) and Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF (3190.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	3466.HK	3190.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.61	1.33	+3.28

Correlation

The correlation between 3466.HK and 3190.HK is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Dividend Comparison

3466.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than 3190.HK's 5.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF	6.86%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
3190.HK Fubon Shanghai-Shenzhen-Hong Kong High Dividend Yield ETF	5.98%	6.12%	6.82%	8.53%	3.11%

Drawdowns

3466.HK vs. 3190.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3466.HK drawdown since its inception was -8.04%, smaller than the maximum 3190.HK drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3466.HK and 3190.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	3466.HK	3190.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.04%	-17.31%	+9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-3.39%	-3.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-5.40%	+4.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	3466.HK	3190.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.30%	17.94%	-3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.30%	18.98%	-4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.30%	18.98%	-4.68%