3466.HK vs. 3110.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) and Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF (3110.HK).
3466.HK and 3110.HK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3466.HK is a passively managed fund by Hang Seng Investment Management that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2025. 3110.HK is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Hang Seng High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Jun 17, 2013. Both 3466.HK and 3110.HK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF | 7.58% | 52.57% |
3110.HK Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF | 6.18% | 42.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3466.HK achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than 3110.HK's 6.18% return.
3466.HK
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3110.HK
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison
3466.HK has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3110.HK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK — Risk / Return Rank
3466.HK
3110.HK
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) and Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF (3110.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3466.HK | 3110.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.71 | 0.45 | +4.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3466.HK and 3110.HK is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Dividend Comparison
3466.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than 3110.HK's 5.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF | 6.82% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
3110.HK Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF | 5.88% | 6.15% | 6.81% | 8.30% | 7.34% | 7.32% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 6.32% | 4.28% | 5.69% |
Drawdowns
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3466.HK drawdown since its inception was -8.04%, smaller than the maximum 3110.HK drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3466.HK and 3110.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3466.HK | 3110.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.04% | -34.74% | +26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.63% | -5.51% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -11.91% | +10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility
3466.HK vs. 3110.HK - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3466.HK | 3110.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 16.78% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 19.70% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 22.26% | -7.95% |